Showing posts with label High Stakes Tests. Show all posts
Showing posts with label High Stakes Tests. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

High-Stakes Testing and U.S.-Mexican Youth in Texas: The Case for Multiple Compensatory Criteria in Assessment



"With the recent re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
(ESEA) that calls for testing at virtually every grade level, a growing debate is taking
place regarding the utility of mass, but especially high-stakes, testing whereby schools,
principals, teachers, and students are held accountable for increased children’s
achievement (e.g., Scheurich et al. 2000; Scheurich and Skrla 2000; Valencia et al.
2001).1 Proponents of the current system of accountability in Texas, which does have
high-stakes testing as its linchpin, see the system as bringing attention to previously
under-served African American and Mexican American children, the majority of whom
are poor (Scheurich et al. 2000; Scheurich and Skrla 2000; Skrla et al. 2000a, 2000b).2
“High stakes” testing extends beyond the concept of standardized testing to denote the
attaching of high-stakes consequences (like retention, promotion, or graduation) to test
performance (Heuber and Hauser 1999).


Opponents take issue not with the concept of accountability, but rather with the
high stakes that are attached to the tests themselves,
as well as to their collateral effects,
including the marginalizing of curriculum, children, or both
(McNeil 2000; McNeil and
Valenzuela 2001). Sloan (forthcoming) reconciles these perspectives by suggesting that
while proponents have an “outside-in” view, critics possess an “inside-out” perspective.
In other words, proponents view the classroom from the outside (i.e., a “top-down”
perspective)
and note that previously under-served children have been accorded greater
teacher and administrative attention. Critics, on the other hand, look at high-stakes
testing policies from the perspective of the classroom where they witness the collateral
effects
brought about by such high pressures to generate positive performance. These
include narrowing the curriculum by teaching to the test; marginalizing children, their
languages and cultures
; and gaming” the system such as by retaining children in grade
or relegating them to test-exempt status categories to produce positive test results and
school ratings
."

More Here

Friday, April 20, 2012

Lew Blackburn - Third Board Agenda Request -- Resolution Concerning High Stakes, Standardized Testing - TASA and TASB


As of April 19, 2012, 344 Texas school districts have  adopted the resolution. TASA

*************************************************************************************************************
Third Email Request
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Third Board Agenda Request -- Resolution Concerning High Stakes, Standardized Testing - TASA and TASB
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:05:12 +0000
From: Ranger, Carla
To: Lew Blackburn, King, Alan
CC:

Good morning,

More than disappointing, your reply is a reminder that politics too often prevails
at Dallas ISD.

This is my third request to you on behalf of our children, teachers, parents, taxpayers,
and the Texas Association of School Boards. The first request was made April 2, 2012;
the second was made on April 18, 2012.

Please refer me to the Board policy that requires a consensus for an item to
be placed on the agenda. I am not aware of any policy that requires a consensus. 
The Board does not act by consensus.

Four Board members spoke against the Resolution at the Board Briefing - Lew Blackburn,
Bernadette Nutall, Edwin Flores and Nancy Bingham. No other Trustee spoke either way.

Your refusal to allow an up or down Board vote undermines democracy and robs our
community of an opportunity to address the important issue of high stakes testing.

The Resolution is supported by hundreds of school districts, as well as the two
leading public education organizations in Texas - TASA and TASB. Texas
Commissioner of Education Robert Scott has also spoken publicly against the excessive
use of high stakes tests.

What possible justification do you have to block Board action? If Board members
don't support the resolution, their votes will defeat it.

Again, I request that you place this important Resolution on the Agenda
in the interest of our children, teachers, parents and public education.

Please include this email address when responding: Carla@CarlaRanger.com.

Awaiting your reply,

Carla Ranger
District 6 Trustee.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Lew Blackburn again refuses to allow Board vote on testing resolution approved by TASA, TASB and over 300 Texas school districts



TASA - Texas Association of School Administrators
TASB - Texas Association of School Boards

From: Lew Blackburn
Sent:
Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:12 PM
To:
Ranger, Carla; King, Alan P
Cc:

Subject:
Re: Second Board Agenda Request -- Resolution Concerning High Stakes, Standardized Testing - TASA and TASB

Carla,
I appreciate you bringing the resolution to the Board's attention.  However, after the Briefing discussion, I did not get a sense that there was a consensus for this item to move forward for consideration.  As such, I will not add it to the agenda for the April 26, 2012 Board meeting for discussion and possible adoption.

However, as I indicated during the Briefing, if three (3) trustees request that the resolution be placed on the agenda, I will honor the request.  As of today, you are the only trustee who has made the request.  Please note, the agenda will be approved for posting by 3:00 p.m. Friday, April 20.

 Lew Blackburn, Ph.D.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Gov. Jerry Brown calls for less testing


***************************************************************************************************************************************************************
"California’s Jerry Brown, who has gone further than any other governor in blasting modern test-based school reform, said Wednesday that he wants to reduce the number of standardized tests students take, give more authority to local school boards and design a system to measure education performance that is less test-centric than the one now in use.
Brown, in his State of the State 2012 address Wednesday, expanded on sentiments he expressed last October in a message explaining that he was vetoing an education bill because it relied too heavily on standardized tests for high-stakes accountability purposes.
Wednesday he said students take too many standardized tests, and that the results are given too late for teachers to get much use out of them. He also said that state and federal governments have too much power when it comes to making decisions about education and that he wants to return some to local school boards."